Previous Page  43 / 88 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 43 / 88 Next Page
Page Background

Better Farming

August 2016

Farm News First >

BetterFarming.com

43

A

s I drive around Ontario I see

a lot of deep ripping going on.

When you go to farm shows

there are more deep rippers now than

a few years ago. At last year’s Cana-

da’s Outdoor Farm Show, there were

more deep rippers than ever.

So what is all the interest in deep

ripping? Is it a fad? Or is it farmers

wanting to hear their tractors really

work? Maybe yes to both. But the

real reason farmers are using deep

rippers is compaction.

Compaction in Ontario soils is

real. If you work up an old fence

bottom or land that has not been

worked in years you notice how well

the crop grows. Generally this is

because of less compaction.

The number one cause of compac-

tion is wheel traffic. The biggest factor

is larger tractors and combines. Tracks

and radial tires can only do so much

to alleviate tire-caused compaction.

This wheel-traffic compaction is

increased because of earlier planting.

You get higher yields by planting

earlier. Drainage allows you to get

onto land sooner but the subsoil is

still wet. This wetter subsoil compacts

more when wet. Wetter harvests two

and three years ago meant more

by PAT LYNCH

CROPS:

THE

LYNCH

FILE

Let ’er rip!

Is deep ripping fad or necessity? U.S. studies reveal some surprising results.

compaction. You had to get the crop

off knowing you were compacting the

soil.

Thaw-freeze cycles help but only

with compaction in the top five or six

inches. Adding forages to the rotation

can help, but most forage fields are

more compacted than cash-cropped

fields. This is because of the number

of times harvesting equipment tracks

a field. Crops grow better after

forages because of factors other than

compaction.

Is no-till the answer to overcoming

compaction? In tillage studies on a

loamy sand at the Sand Plain Experi-

mental Farm at Becker, Minnesota,

comparing no-till, chisel, moldboard

and ridge-till systems, and at a study

on a silt loam at Arlington, Wiscon-

sin, comparing chisel, moldboard and

ridge-till systems, the greatest resis-

tance to penetration in the 0- to

12-inch depth occurred on the no-till

treatments. (As reported in a compac-

tion study by the University of

Minnesota.)

Where no tillage was done,

freezing and thawing over winter

reduced the bulk density only slightly

and only above the six-inch depth. In

this study, chisel plow and disk

treatments were less effective than

the moldboard plow in removing

surface compaction in one over-win-

ter period. These results confirm

freezing and thawing alone may not

remove compaction.

No-till will help if you are using

Tracks and radial tires can only do so much to alleviate tire-caused

compaction.

Forage fields are compacted because of the number of times harvesting

equipment tracks a field.