Dairy Farmer ads target Ottawa politicians

© AgMedia Inc.

Ads in key political publications promote the concept of supply management, not milk itself

Description (Tag): 

Comments

The dairy industry is, as always, dreaming in technicolour if they think they can persuade anyone with an IQ bigger than their shoe size that supply management doesn't make products more expensive. For example, in late 2010, the Dairy Farmers of Ontario (DFO) placed a full page ad in major newspapers touting the benefits of supply management - however, the numbers cited by DFO showed that Ontario consumers were paying almost 38% more for milk than US consumers, and that the farm gate price of milk in Ontario was within pennies per liter of the US retail price. In addition, because dairy quota can be readily sold, but can't readily be bought, dairy farming has become more of a protectionist cult than anything else, and no politician is going to continue to support that kind of cult, especially when it also pits farmers not just against consumers, but against each other. Finally, while any protectionist system, such as supply management, does contribute to a country's GDP, the 38% extra that consumers pay, by definition, reduces jobs and GDP by an even greater amount - therefore the dairy industry's claim of jobs created and GDP increases because of supply management, while true in the narrowest possible sense, are completely false when viewed from the overall public policy perspective. I can't figure out if the Dairy Farmers of Canada really are dumb enough to believe their own advertising, or just that completely scared - it's probably both.

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

Yes, the people in Ottawa could not possibly figure out the advantages and disadvantages of SM on their own, without the insight/selfserving views of the dairy industry. I agree, opening up the industry would create more jobs and more GDP. Young farmers could actually get into the industry, co-operatives would develop, small cheese plants could start up, niche markets would be filled. Yes we would see big farms get bigger....oh wait, that's already happening. It just takes longer for them to buy up the quota and get the guaranteed income.

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.