Search
Better Farming OntarioBetter PorkBetter Farming Prairies

Better Farming Ontario Featured Articles

Better Farming Ontario magazine is published 11 times per year. After each edition is published, we share featured articles online.


Ontario's environment ministry scrutinizes water-taking charges

Wednesday, November 4, 2015

by SUSAN MANN

The Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change is reviewing its water-taking charges, but it has no plans to alter the rules on how the water permit process works.

Ministry spokesperson Kate Jordan says the ministry is “looking at options that would enable us to more fully recover the costs of managing the permit program as well as our water quality programs. We will be consulting with stakeholders on future options.”

Jordan says, “our (water-taking) charges apply to highly consumptive commercial and industrial water users. They don’t apply to agricultural operations.”

The ministry regulates water through the Ontario Water Resources Act. A person or facility taking more than 50,000 litres of water daily, including farmers using water for crop irrigation but not for giving to livestock or poultry, must get a permit. Currently only the highly consumptive commercial and industrial water users, such as bottled water companies and ready-mix concrete producers, have to pay a charge of $3.71 per million litres of water they take.

The fees don’t apply to agricultural operations, which historically haven’t been considered to be highly consumptive or commercial/industrial users, she says. The administrative fee to process the permit application, which is separate from the $3.71 per million-litre water charge, also doesn’t apply to farmers.

The permit process itself is not under review, Jordan notes.

Ontario’s acting Environmental Commissioner Ellen Schwartzel was critical of the low fee water users pay in her 2014/15 annual report issued Tuesday, saying it works out to less than $10 for the water to fill an Olympic-sized pool.

 She also said the government hasn’t made any progress on recovering the full costs of its water programs from users, including making sectors like agriculture that currently don’t pay anything, pay for their water. The government only recovers 1.2 per cent of the $16.2 million it spends on water quality programs.

In her report, Schwartzel says as of March 2015, there were more than 6,000 active water-taking permits. The maximum volume permitted to be taken annually by the water taking permit holders was more than 500 trillion litres.

Jordan says of the 6,000 permits, 35 to 40 per cent are for crop irrigation. “The majority of the permits, more than 55 per cent, are for short-term projects at construction sites, quarries, product manufacturing and other commercial uses.” Ten per cent of the permits are for municipalities for drinking water.

Don McCabe says “when it comes to agriculture and the use of water, water permits are not a direct correlation to the water used. The permits are just an indication that you might want to use that water.”

McCabe says it’s important to remember that God predominately irrigates agriculture, as a whole. “We purify a lot of water by sending it to aquifers and back out to lakes. We keep it flowing.”

Schwartzel’s suggestion that farmers should pay for the water they use “is not valid,” McCabe adds. “The government is not doing anything more than issuing a piece of paper. What service is the government offering, other than doing an accounting for their own purposes?”

In her report, Schwartzel also says the environment ministry needs to be more open and transparent when issuing water-taking permits. Currently only one-quarter of all permits are posted for public comment on the province’s Environmental Registry. Permits for municipal or agricultural users or ones that last less than a year are never shared publicly, and many of these are “high risk users.”

In other environmental commission news posted on its website, noted environmental lawyer Dianne Saxe was chosen by unanimous agreement of Ontario’s Legislature to be the province’s new environmental commissioner. Her appointment is effective Dec. 1. BF

Current Issue

March 2025

Better Farming Magazine

Farms.com Breaking News

Farmer Planting Decisions for 2025 Taking Shape

Thursday, March 13, 2025

As farmers across Canada prepare for the 2025 crop year, Statistics Canada says their planting decisions reflect a complex mix of factors including moisture conditions, crop rotation considerations, and market prices. Nationally, farmers are expected to plant more wheat, corn for... Read this article online

International Women’s Day – Angela Cammaert

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

As International Women’s Day approaches on March 8, Farms.com is asking women in ag about what they’d tell their younger selves about being a farmer, to give a piece of advice to young women entering the ag sector, and to highlight a woman in agriculture they consider a mentor or... Read this article online

Keep Yours Toes Warm in Every Season with the Agro 897

Friday, February 28, 2025

BY: Zahra Sadiq Say goodbye to leaky boots that don’t keep you warm, the Lemigo Agro 897 offers durable waterproof protection, insulation for all-day comfort, and a sturdy design perfect for tackling tough farm tasks in any weather. Lemigo is a family business, 26 years strong, that... Read this article online

BF logo

It's farming. And it's better.

 

a Farms.com Company

Subscriptions

Subscriber inquiries, change of address, or USA and international orders, please email: subscriptions@betterfarming.com or call 888-248-4893 x 281.


Article Ideas & Media Releases

Have a story idea or media release? If you want coverage of an ag issue, trend, or company news, please email us.

Follow us on Social Media

 

Sign up to a Farms.com Newsletter

 

DisclaimerPrivacy Policy2025 ©AgMedia Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Back To Top