Previous Page  26 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

26 December 2016

Pork News & Views

genetics and health statuses, which may

help explain why the results were not

identical on both farms. Table 1 and

Table 2 show the results for Barns 1 and

2 respectively. For both barns we saw

significantly higher feed disappearance

(intake) when piglets were fed large pel-

lets compared to the mini pellet, in both

the farrowing room and the nursery

post-weaning.

In Barn 1, although we saw increased

feed disappearance, piglet weights and

gains were lower at the time of wean-

ing for the litters fed the large pellets.

However, by one week post-weaning,

and carried through to 28 days post-

weaning, piglets fed the large pellets had

caught up to their counterparts, and

variability was reduced. In this barn,

we observed less of a post-weaning

growth lag in piglets fed the large pellets

(Figure 2), which helps explain how they

were able to catch up in body weight.

Although their body weight was lower at

weaning, they did not lose weight imme-

diately after weaning, which did occur

with piglets fed the small pellets.

In Barn 2, we observed no difference in

the weaning weights of pigs, but weight

gain was higher in the first week post-

weaning for piglets fed the large pellets

compared to the small pellets, and we

tended to see higher body weights of

the piglets at d28 post-weaning. Piglets

fed the large pellets also had lower vari-

ability in weights within a pen over time.

In Barn 2, we did not observe evidence

of a post-weaning growth lag with

piglets fed the small or large pellets;

however, we did see that piglets fed the

large pellets had larger gains in the first

week post-weaning (Figure 3).

Summary

In both barns we saw increased feed

disappearance (intake) in the farrowing

rooms and in the nursery when piglets

were offered large pellets. Despite lower

weaning weights in Barn 1 (possibly re-

lated to health challenges), this translat-

ed into a reduced post-weaning growth

lag compared to piglets offered small

Table 1: Barn 1 results.

Small Pellets Large Pellets Significant (Y/N) Difference

1

Farrowing Room

Creep Intake (g/litter/d)

Week 1

20

150

Y

130

Week 2

80

400

Y

320

Average

50

270

Y

220

Average Piglet Weight (kg)

Birth

2

1.62

1.63

N

Weaning (~21 d)

6.98

6.49

N

Gain (birth to wean)

5.36

4.86

Y

-0.50

Nursery

Feed Intake (g/pig)

Wean to 2d post-wean

140

250

Y

110

d2 to d6 post-wean

690

1190

Y

500

Wean to d6 post-wean

830

1440

Y

610

Average Piglet Weight (kg)

Weaning

6.98

6.49

N

2d post-wean

6.76

6.49

N

6d post-wean

7.47

6.99

N

28d post-wean

15.91

15.43

N

Average Piglet Gain (kg)

d2 to d6 post-wean

0.71

0.50

Y

-0.21

d2 to d28 post-wean

8.45

8.44

N

d6 to d28 post-wean

9.16

8.94

N

1

Difference calculated as large pellet value minus small pellet value when significance was deter-

mined.

2

Creep feed treatments were not offered until 1 week after birth.

Figure 2: Piglet weights at weaning, 2d and 7d post-weaning showing the post-

weaning growth lag in Barn 1, which was more pronounced in piglets fed small

pellets.

48hr Post-Weanging

d7 Post-Weanging

8.0

7.5

7.0

6.5

6.0

5.5

5.0

Piglet Weight (kg)

Large Pellets

Small Pellets

Weaning