Organic milk processor owes millions

© AgMedia Inc.

Comments

Communism has been waggishly described as you milking the cow, the state taking the milk and then shooting you, or,wait, that may be fascism. Anarchy would be when someone steals the cow and shoots it too.

I can't imagine the frustration currently being felt by the dairy-farmer members of this co-op knowing that the milk they produce (70% of the total market) is being diverted by the DFO commissars to processors who are trying to (and apparently did) drive the co-op processing plant out of business.

Whether this structural imbalance is communism, fascism or anarchy, the point remains that it is just plain stupid for DFO to deny that DFO policies had anything to do with this company's demise when nobody is denying that the owners of the co-op produced way more than enough milk needed to have prevented this milk-supply constipation in the first place.

Or, to look at it in another way, any time a vested interest group denies responsibility, they're usually guilty as Hell, and then some.

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

The DFO. has pushed many dairy producers a processors out the milk industry. Stephen for once i agree with you.

Western farmers long-chafed under the monopoly power and pooling policies of the Canadian Wheat Board (CWB) in exactly the same way organic dairy farmers who produced enough milk to supply their own co-op (but weren't allowed to deliver it) are now chafing at the way the monopoly power and pooling policies of the Dairy Farmers of Ontario contributed to supply problems at, and resulting bankruptcy of, this particular dairy processing co-op.

Therefore, even though federal Ag Minister Gerry Ritz currently boasts about supporting supply management forever, he threw the CWB under the bus claiming he was giving western farmers the "freedom" to sell their wheat to whoever they wanted, and whenever they wanted - he could, should and hopefully will, throw DFO under the same bus on behalf of organic dairy farmers and Canadian consumers for exactly the same reason, and the sooner, the better.

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

They need to change the way they operate as many urban consumers are very up set with the way supply management handles the organic and small flocks

They never had a hope with the D.F.O. controlling their milk supply

They owe what seems to add up to about 16 million @ 8% interest that is over $1,000,000 a million dollars a year just in interest payments,

That is a big number to over come.

Local farmer

About a 200 cow operation with land yes they would have been better off investing in that instead of trying to be inavative fools

Nowhere in the article is an 8% interest figure, or any interest figure for that matter, even mentioned.

Furthermore, while "local farmer" is obsessed about interest rates which seem to exist only in his/her mind, he/she completely ignores the issue which goes to straight to the heart of the matter and which was succinctly expressed in the article by Mr. Mcquail:

"We are being denied access to our own farmers' milk"

Therefore, blaming management, the Board of Directors and the capital structure of the company for its demise overlooks an equal, if not greater culprit, the proverbial "last straw" in the ethics (and/or possible lack thereof) of DFO's denial of supply as quite-accurately noted by Mr. McQuail.

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

This scenario reminds me of the producer/owners of Conestoga and their dispute with the former Ontario Pork. That ended with the marketing powers of Ontario Pork being removed.
Their comes a point when the owner of the product...be it hogs, western grain or organic dairy products see the advantages of taking control of their own destiny and the disadvantages of dictatorial control.
It takes commitment, confidence, ability and hard work...but this is a democracy...isn't it?
D. Linton

Editor: Comment will be published if resubmitted and signed.

Stephen the question I would have is even if they had full access to their milk could they possibly sell enough milk at the margins required to be able to service the debt ? Their main rivals seems to be doing very well with their allocations Harmony and Organic Meadow would be a fair comparison both farmer owned
One very successful and one that has continually struggled year after year, but always seemed to find new investor money, to keep to operational.

I think you would agree that always needing a life line isn't healthy for a business that has been around for 25 plus years.

Sean McGivern

While:

(1) management ability,
(2) individual and/or collective limitations of the Board
(3) financial structure and/or cost/volume/profit limitations

are all issues in this and any business, they are, in this case, not THE issue at the heart of the matter because without an adequate amount of product to make the cost/volume/profit equation work, even a business with 100% equity is going to go under.

Margin and volume are two sides of the same coin - huge margins and low volumes (dairy farming under supply management) are the order of the day in some industries while low margins and high volumes (grocery store retailing) are the order of the day in others.

As Mr. Linton has already pointed out, it doesn't matter whether it was Conestoga Packers being strangled by Ontario Pork, western farmers being strangled by the Canadian Wheat Board or organic dairy farmers being strangled by DFO, the common culprit is the socialist mentality of "pooling" and single-desk selling which rewards mediocrity and simultaneously punishes initiative and consumers.

Stephen Thompson, Clinton ON

You just described the U.S. Agriculture and the U.S. Farm Bill.

Yep, U.S. Farm Bill induced Fence Row to Fence Row Farming lives on.

Some might also say balls to walls boys or until the last farmer cries uncle as we continue to overflood the world S. & D. market with ever increasing overproduction so that farmers can subsidize the rest of society.

Editor: Comment will be published if resubmitted and signed.

Post new comment

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
Image CAPTCHA
We welcome thoughtful comments and ideas. Comments must be on topic. Cheap shots, unsubstantiated allegations, anonymous attacks or negativity directed against people and organizations will not be published. Comments are modified or deleted at the discretion of the editors. If you wish to be identified by name, which will give your opinion far more weight and provide a far greater chance of being published, leave a telephone number so that identity can be confirmed. The number will not be published.